Page 31 - DesMoinesRiver
P. 31
IMPROVEMENTS TO NAVIGATION Bangs Brothers of New York who were to (Hussey 1900:333,341; Annals of Iowa 4(5):393–
complete the project in four years. The company 394). Sometimes men had to be hired to “warp”
The success of the Ione came to the attention of quickly became mired in controversy. Accusa- the steamboat upstream by pulling on ropes
Congress. On November 8, 1846 they passed tions were made that the company’s owners stretched from the capstans to trees, stumps,
the Des Moines River Lands Grant which deeded were skimming funds for their personal use. A and snags both in and out of the river (Hussey
large blocks of public land along the river to the long and expensive inquiry produced few results, 1900:359). In the low precipitation year of 1854,
soon-to-be State of Iowa. The Grant allowed and the contract was eventually terminated the captain of the Julia Dean ordered his tallest
the federal government to provide Iowa Terri- along with the entire river improvement project deckhand overboard in areas of low water. The
tory with public land “for the purpose of aiding (Muessig 1977:3). The land grant was obtained man would wade in front of the boat seeking out
said territory to improve the navigation of the by the Keokuk and Des Moines River Railroad the deepest water and the pilot would “steer for
Des Moines River from its mouth to the Rac- Company, and in 1869 they used the land to him.” The season is said to have closed in July of
coon Fork [at present day Des Moines].” The begin construction of a railroad along the banks this year (Hussey 1900:260).
state was to find a company to take control of of the river (Anderson 2004:16).
271,000 acres of land along the river in return Too much water also caused problems. When
for the company building a series of 28 dams A TROUBLESOME RIVER – STRUGGLES WITH the river was flooding out of its banks, pilots
and 9 locks to ensure that the 204 mile stretch NAVIGATION could lose track of the channel and get lost, run-
of the river would be navigable. An engineer- ning aground on hidden snags and getting caught
ing survey determined the precise placement Despite the efforts at improvement, steamboat between trees. Even the locks and dams be-
of each dam to ensure the proper pool depth navigation of the Des Moines proved a prob- came hazards (Hussey 1900:340–342). Hussey
upriver at the location of the next dam. The plan lem. The travel season was dependent on the (1900:340) recalls an account from the flood
also called for the construction of three canal inconstant weather and its length was variable year of 1851 when a stern wheeler attempted
sections with the hope of shortening the route. and unpredictable. It usually began in April after to climb over the dam at Bonaparte. The stern
the ice had gone out of the river and ended came out of the water as the boat climbed and
Despite the initial optimism, the project only whenever the water became too low, sometimes the paddle wheel was unable to gain purchase.
completed the first seven sets of dams and as early as July. In good years it could extend After several failed attempts to get over the dam
locks reaching upriver from the Mississippi as far into September or even, October (Hussey the cargo was unloaded and stored at Bonaparte
as Keosauqua. Dams eight and nine remained 1900:361,363). Whenever navigable water pre- while the captain returned to St. Louis to find
incomplete and construction on the remaining vailed, the villages along the lower Des Moines another boat so he could try again weeks later.
locks and dams never began. The project was became centers of great activity with frequent In another case, it was reported that a steam-
hindered by confusion and burdened by poor arrivals and departures of steamboats. When boat captain “ripped the gates off of the lock
management, corruption, and malfeasance. the river levels were low, however, the boats ran at Farmington to ‘open the way for free naviga-
Work began in 1849 on several of the locks and into difficulties. Often steamboats ran aground tion’” (Hussey 1900:340).
on a ten-mile canal at the mouth of the river, and keel boats had to be called into service to
each under a separate contract. In 1851 the state help free them. At other times, goods had to be Steamboat travelers also incurred a certain
legislature decided that the work could best be unloaded and transported overland or put into amount of risk. The boats were alarmingly
carried on by a single contractor. They selected storage until the river became passable again prone to accidents caused by boiler explosions,
The University of Iowa Off ice of the State Archaeologist 31